VO2max: der am besten belegte Einzelmarker für Lebenserwartung
Kaum ein Laborwert sagt so viel über die kommenden Jahrzehnte aus wie die maximale Sauerstoffaufnahme.
Die kardiorespiratorische Fitness, gemessen als VO2max, gehört zu den stärksten Prädiktoren für Gesamtsterblichkeit, die die Epidemiologie kennt. Der Unterschied zwischen dem untersten und dem zweituntersten Fitness-Quintil ist dabei größer als der Effekt vieler klassischer Risikofaktoren.
Der größte Gewinn liegt ganz unten
Das ist die eigentliche Botschaft: Der größte Gewinn entsteht nicht beim Sprung von gut auf sehr gut, sondern beim Sprung von untrainiert auf mäßig trainiert. Wer heute bei 28 ml/kg/min liegt, holt mit einem Anstieg auf 34 mehr heraus als jemand, der von 48 auf 54 verbessert.
Trainierbar in jedem Alter
VO2max ist zudem trainierbar, in jedem Alter. Kombinierte Programme aus Grundlagenausdauer und wenigen hochintensiven Intervallen erhöhen den Wert typischerweise innerhalb von zwölf bis sechzehn Wochen messbar.
Kernaussagen
- Der größte Effekt liegt beim Übergang von untrainiert zu mäßig trainiert.
- VO2max lässt sich in jedem Alter steigern – auch jenseits der Sechzig.
- Schätzwerte aus Wearables sind für Trends brauchbar, für Absolutwerte nur bedingt.
Vertiefen Mein Befund nennt METs statt VO2max – wie rechne ich das um?
Nächster Schritt Wie steigere ich meine VO2max ab 45 gezielt – mit 80/20 und 4x4-Intervallen?
Querverbindung Gibt es neben der VO2max einen ähnlich einfachen Marker für die Lebenserwartung? Belege (3)
Open-Access-Publikationen mit offener Lizenz, direkt verlinkt.
Validation of Aerobic Capacity (VO2max) and Pulse Oximetry in Wearable Technology
Abstract
<h4>Introduction</h4>As wearable technology becomes increasingly popular and sophisticated, independent validation is needed to determine its accuracy and potential applications. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy (validity) of VO2max estimates and blood oxygen saturation measured via pulse oximetry using the Garmin fēnix 6 with a general population participant pool.<h4>Methods</h4>We recruited apparently healthy individuals (both active and sedentary) for VO2max (n = 19) and pulse oximetry testing (n = 22). VO2max was assessed through a graded exercise test and an outdoor run, comparing results from the Garmin fēnix 6 to a criterion measurement obtained from a metabolic system. Pulse oximetry involved comparing fēnix 6 readings under normoxic and hypoxic conditions against a medical-grade pulse oximeter. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, error analysis, correlation analysis, equivalence testing, and bias assessment, with the validation criteria set at a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) > 0.7 and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) < 10%.<h4>Results</h4>The Garmin fēnix 6 provided accurate VO2max estimates, closely aligning with the 15 s and 30 s averaged laboratory data (MAPE for 30 s avg = 7.05%; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for 30 s avg = 0.73). However, it failed to accurately measure blood oxygen saturation (BOS) under any condition or combined analysis (MAPE for combined conditions BOS = 4.29%; Lin's
Polygenic prediction of cardiorespiratory fitness in the Trøndelag health study (HUNT)
Abstract
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has a strong genetic component and low CRF is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a polygenic score (PGS) for CRF (CRF<sub>PGS</sub>) and assess its associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. We hypothesized that the CRF<sub>PGS</sub> would demonstrate similar cardioprotective benefits as the CRF phenotype. Effect estimates from a genome-wide association study on directly measured CRF in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT; n = 4525) were used in a Bayesian regression framework to develop multiple PGSs in an independent cohort from the UK Biobank (n = 65,165). The top performing score was applied in the HUNT target cohort, excluding the discovery sample (n = 82,109). The PGS-CRF association varied considerably as a function of model fit and phenotypic accuracy. There was a difference of 1.55 [95% confidence interval: 1.26, 1.84] mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> between the bottom and top decile of the CRF<sub>PGS</sub>. Moreover, a high CRF<sub>PGS</sub> demonstrated cardioprotective effects, with reduced risk for CVD, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and all-cause mortality. Additionally, in women, we observed that the CRF<sub>PGS</sub> predisposed to lower risk of heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We developed the first PGS for CRF using gold standard phenotypes and multiple independent cohorts. Genetic susceptibili
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Multimorbidity Risk, and 15-Year Trajectories in Chronic Disease Accumulation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has been linked to lower risk of individual chronic diseases, but little is known about the CRF in relation to multimorbidity.<h4>Objectives</h4>The authors investigated the association between CRF and multimorbidity risk and explored differences in the trajectories of chronic disease accumulation at varying levels of CRF.<h4>Methods</h4>The study included 38,348 adults from the UK Biobank (mean age 55.21 ± 8.15 years; 51.95% female) who were followed for up to 15 years to detect the incidence of 59 common chronic diseases. CRF was estimated using a 6-minute submaximal exercise test and tertiled as low, moderate, and high (after standardization by age and sex). Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of 2 or more chronic diseases. Data were analyzed using Cox regression, Laplace regression, and linear mixed-effects models.<h4>Results</h4>During the follow-up (median [IQR]: 11.57 [7.39-11.76] years), 15,368 (40.08%) participants developed multimorbidity. The risk of multimorbidity was 21% lower in participants with high compared to low CRF (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.76-0.83]). The median time to multimorbidity onset was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.01-1.54) years later for those with high compared to low CRF. Moreover, participants with high CRF experienced a significantly slower annual rate of chronic disease accumulation (β = -0.043 [-0.050 to -0.036]).<h4>Conclusions</h4>High CRF is associated with lower multimorbidity risk, delayed onset
Quellen aus Europe PMC, ausschließlich CC0, CC BY oder CC BY-SA. Der redaktionelle Text ist eine eigene Formulierung, keine Übernahme aus den Originalarbeiten.
Medizinische Prüfung: Dr. med. Anna Reuter, Fachärztin für Innere Medizin, 06. August 2026.
Fehler gefunden oder eine Frage zum Beitrag? Wir prüfen jeden Hinweis gegen die Quellen.
Hinweis an den Leserservice